What Google doesn’t want you to know: the truth about startpages

What Google doesn’t want you to know: the truth about startpages

There’s something magical about the internet. When it all started for the public, back in 1996, we might not have realized it fully. But now it’s truly clear: humankind is connected like never before. What we photograph, film, or write can be shared instantly, all over the globe. Friends or acquaintances are no longer destined to disappear from memory. For good or bad, information and communication have never been so accessible to so many people at the same time. Still, as the controversy around Facebook and Cambridge Analytics has shown, we should always be vigilant. The big corporations work in mysterious ways. Unless forced by law they tend to keep their cards to their chest. Understandably. If I were a big multinational with vested interests all over the world, I would too. But I’m not. I’m part of a small outfit that decided to pick up the ball where Google dropped it. This is the true story of Internet start pages.

Classic startpage: Netscape Navigator

The homepage of Netscape, back in the day, brings back feelings of nostalgia.
The homepage of Netscape, back in the day, brings back feelings of nostalgia.

We couldn’t begin telling this story without Netscape Navigator, back in 1994. One of the very first browsers to capture the imagination of the public. Co-written by Marc Andreessen, and based on the Mosaic browser, it ushered in the beginning of the user-friendly connection of computers all over the world. While the first version was free, eventually Netscape Navigator was only free for university and non-profit use. It offered technological innovations such as the ‘on-the-fly’ display of web pages, even when they were still downloading in the background. For slower dial-up connections this was a real plus.

The de-facto standard in the late 1990s, I like to see Netscape Navigator also as a fine example of the first start page paradigm. Netscape gave people the opportunity to connect to the internet by a telephone line (don’t you miss the annoying buzzing sound?). And while it at first limited its start page to company news, it later also provided a bit of news, opinions, and advertising, right there on the page. Especially after AOL bought the company, back in 1998, we see this part of the browsing experience come to full fruition.

The first browser war: Internet Explorer

The beginning of the first Browser War: Microsoft Explorer attacks
The beginning of the first Browser War: Microsoft Explorer attacks

With a market share of over 50% and some signs of monopolistic behavior, Netscape Navigator considered the future of computing to be theirs. Their browser operated on about every operating system. It looked identical on all of them. And what if all programs could be run from within the browser window itself? At its public IPO, back in August 1995, its value had skyrocketed to 3 billion USD. Netscape was the de-facto portal to the web.

But the same year, 1995, also saw the release of Microsoft’s latest version of the operating system, Windows 95, with the free browser Internet Explorer. This browser was built on the same Mosaic platform as Navigator and started out as a non-competitive alternative. But it was free, and it got improved, until, in 1996, with the release of version 3.0 it had fully caught up with Netscape. And as the development of Explorer continued while Netscape faltered, market share slowly but surely went over to Microsoft. There are many other reasons for the demise of Navigator, but the result was undeniable: by 2002 Internet Explorer was leading the pack with a market share of over 95%.

Homepage of MSN

And what did you see when you opened the program? The homepage of MSN.com. With a general section of bookmarks, news, and advertisements. There is also the opportunity to sign in and ‘Customize your own page with local news, weather, and more!’ It really didn’t look very much different from the start page you’d get on Netscape Navigator. But it was free, stable, and modern. Sometimes that’s enough to win a war.

A snapshot of the MSN homepage, November 2002.
A snapshot of the MSN homepage, November 2002.

The second browser war: Chrome

With package deals and a superior product, Microsoft managed to dominate the market for Internet Browsers. But it also raised questions about an abuse of resources and monopolistic behavior, so much so, that it found itself in court. For the customer, this didn’t change anything. Just as before, with Netscape Navigator, the technological advancements of Internet Explorer came to a halt once they achieved their position. This meant security issues. Slower browsing as the technical demands became more complex. It had to take another giant in the world of technology to battle Microsoft and uproot the status quo. This giant was Google, of course.

A comic Scott McCloud, explaining the features of the new browser.
A comic by Scott McCloud, explaining the features of the new browser.

What Google started in 2008, was nothing less than a second browser war. Based on part of the technology of Netscape, the Mozilla project was a brand-new Open Source project. It was developed for the many new applications the Internet would come to thrive upon, such as chat programs, YouTube videos, and e-mail programs. It aimed to be fast (hence: chrome, as used on fast motorcycles), designed for new applications, and safe. Eventually, Google built a whole suite of programs and products around their browser, including Chromecast and Chromebooks.

User experience

The user experience is simple: a few menus and little visual clutter. Just the way they became big with their central search box. Initially, they didn’t want to make a lot of money with their new browser. They just wanted people to use their product. Their revenue from their search engine, just like MacroSoft’s from their Operating System, was enough to keep this pressure off the development team.

It took Google until 2012 to overtake Internet Explorer in terms of market share, and it’s been dominant ever since. And as their engine runs on all platforms, we see their dominance on desktops, cell phones, and tablets alike. Quite an achievement. But at what cost?

What Google meant for start pages

iGoogle when it started, November 2008
iGoogle when it started, November 2008

You can’t really take offense with the Google company when it comes to winning the second browser wars. Their project has simply been chosen by the public. It’s fast, convenient, free. And back in 2008, when you had the choice of at least ten different browsers, if you wanted to install a copy of Windows, it wasn’t Mozilla Firefox or Safari that proved to be the choice. Let alone Explorer. It was Chrome. Now their market share hovers around 56%, quite respectable.

Come to think of it, there’s only one loser in this situation. It’s a customizable homepage. As soon as Google gained the upper hand, they discontinued the service they called iGoogle, which they launched together with their new browser in 2008. This is a more than remarkable business decision. It’s proof that the start page you could change and adapt to meet your own needs, the thing that was really massive in the days of MSN and AOL, is less interesting to them than their own white search box. They prefer you to search for the weather repeatedly, rather than see it right there on the page. It makes perfect sense. This might just be the reason they also discontinued Google Reader, useful as it was for any researcher.

Whenever a service threatens the search, it should go.

The future of start pages

Search the web and nothing more than that!
Search the web and nothing more than that!

With the end of the browser wars, the single search box has definitively won. Simplicity over information. Minimalism over freedom of choice. This is the clean world Google has created for its customers, a world where most algorithms and search results are concocted under the hood. Far away from prying eyes. They took away the personalized start pages, so we’re ever more at the mercy of their business model.

There are risks involved, let’s not forget this: the risk of filter bubbles and loss of productivity through retyping in search of the same information. We could be coaxed in ways we can’t really tell. Manipulated to buy, for example. To vote this or that way.

We put a lot of trust in a company that can follow us on every device we use every day. There’s nothing wrong with that if we’re aware of the fact that we are trusting them. And, with the advances in technology, like HTML5, it’s easier than ever to install our own homepage, to avoid the monolithic search box. We could even install third-party, personalized start pages like start.me, Symbaloo or Netvibes to regain our start page freedom.

We really think Google would approve. In fact, they’re helping us with our efforts.

16 Replies to “What Google doesn’t want you to know: the truth about startpages”

  1. A brilliant point. It’s interesting to realize how much of the ‘thinking’ and ‘deciding’ is done for us by this mega corporation (and related corporate interests). We’ve not just trusted them with our information, but with the answers and sources to the answers to all of our questions.

  2. As many others here have indicated, the demise of iGoogle prompted MY search for a replacement as well. I really liked the look of NetVibes – total customization, but who has that kind of time? While start.me is not the prettiest or ‘flash’-iest (see what I did, there?) – it does precisely what it says it will do, and once I settled on it, I haven’t looked back. Thank you for a very functional startpage!

    1. You’re welcome, Alex! And you’re very much correct: we do focus on stability, speed, and ease of use before everything else. It’s great to be appreciated!

  3. Interesting. I hope you aren’t as old as me. I well remember Netscape. I quite liked it. We were early adopters as one brother was studying computer science and my other brother also works in the industry as a Unix administrator or something like that (I am a computer/maths dummy – black sheep of the family – to be fair we used an abacus when I was at school!!!🙃). We were using a Mac SE (7″ screen, no HD!) I recorded my first album on it too! I knew nothing about Start Up Pages until recently. When I used Safari I used their Top Sites but found it limiting and Safari started to go all weird so I finally switched to Chrome and a youtube channel (I think Tech Gumbo) suggested your site so I gave it a try. I have been using Modern New Tab which I liked a lot. It allowed you to change colours, add images and, apparently, have as many pages as you wanted. So, it was functional and good to look at. However, Start.me, though not as pretty, is way better. I am a “list” person and it suits me. I’d rather have ALL the URLs I need in their own categories. Very useful to me. I can have sport, news, music training, language training and other headings. Anyway, I’m glad I found you and I was surprised to see so many other personal Start pages. I have no intention of investigating them as Start.me seems to be perfect for my needs. Thanks.

  4. Very interesting and well-written article. I have a small quibble, however: I think that the death of start pages happened when browsers started supporting tabs, and then began supporting the same tabs being opened on subsequent browser startups. That was what killed the start page for me, at any rate. Who needs a start page when you’ve got the same pages opening up whenever you start the browser?

  5. Excellent article, love your service – use it every single day. If a person wants to remain on Google, with minimal perosnal control and maximum control to G’s algos – that’s fine! But we shouldn’t all have to join them. Choice, we are all different.

  6. I had basically the same experience as BD Crowell. Started with Navigator, what seems like an eternity ago, then IE. At that time, my startpage was probably ‘My Yahoo’, as they were big in search before Google came along. Once the big G got going, of course, iGoogle was almost a foregone conclusion. The decision to kill iGoogle, while good for the company, certainly did the userbase no favors. I had to find an alternative… To be completely honest, I did experiment with various other startpages (Netvibes, Protopage, MyWay, etc…) They all seemed to either be TOO configurable, or didn’t offer the mix of features I wanted. Then I discovered Start.Me and have really never looked back. It may not have the most eye-candy, but it does exactly what it says it’s going to do, without fuss or bother. And in the end, what more can anybody ask for?

  7. Amazing article, I read the other comment and it is nice. I am not very good at this stuff but yeah. I really like and enjoy Star.me. Can’t wait for your next article. 😀

  8. Hi Stefan,

    Good article. I would like to point out, though, that iGoogle was launched in May of 2005, well before the launch of Chrome. That was my startpage almost from the time it was launched until they took it down in 2013. Following that, I tried of lot of alternatives that never quite did it for me, until I found start.me. Start.me is now my startpage, and while I miss Tea House Fox and the Autumn racoons, it has done an admirable job replacing iGoogle on my many devices.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Be the first to read our latest article.